From 3631b758acfb2585809fdb0755e1a8e7afe3b9b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Smeding <tom@tomsmeding.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:10:47 +0100
Subject: Dual arrays is >100x faster than 'ad' on large fneural

ad:Numeric.AD.Double / ad-dual:Numeric.ADDual.Array.Internal

Prelude> 1.129e-3 / 41.89e-6  -- neural-100
26.951539746956314
Prelude> 34.67e-3 / 156.9e-6  -- neural-180
220.9687699171447
Prelude> 79.03e-3 / 178.6e-6  -- neural-500
442.4972004479283
Prelude> 365.3e-3 / 665.5e-6  -- neural-2000
548.9105935386928
---
 ad-dual.cabal | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

(limited to 'ad-dual.cabal')

diff --git a/ad-dual.cabal b/ad-dual.cabal
index 47340e5..82c1342 100644
--- a/ad-dual.cabal
+++ b/ad-dual.cabal
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ library ad-dual-examples
   exposed-modules:
     Numeric.ADDual.Examples
   build-depends:
+    ad-dual,
     deepseq,
     hedgehog,
     vector
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2