| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
ixsFromIxX'/ixsFromIxR'
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
in preparation for deriving Foldable for []
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as breaking the chain of specialization (but it's currently broken,
so these may be false positives, but these pragmas may be handy
in the future anyway and they can't do much harm in theory
and in practice they are right now neutral performance-wise).
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
until maybe we make shaped and ranked newtypes over mixed?
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
TODO: use lemmas in place of the unsafeCoerceRefl
|